It’s 2018, and in the event that you think colonization issues are finished, you would be incredibly mixed up. England and Mauritius are at loggerheads in view of the Chagos Islands, the final African settlement of the old British Empire. The real issues in question are the way the inheritance of imperialism is denying Mauritius self-assurance and sway.
Chagos is an archipelago in the Indian Ocean south of the Maldives. Its sway is questioned among Britain and Mauritius – an immediate aftereffect of the poisonous inheritances of imperialism. The issue is right now under the steady gaze of the International Court of Justice. The British, in 1965, three years previously Mauritius’ autonomy, withdrew the Chagos Islands from Mauritius.
As Mauritius got independence in 1968, the islands remained under Britain’s control. The Chagos had been part of Mauritius and home to Chagossians before the entire population of around 2,000 people was forcibly removed by the British government and the US to make way for a strategic US military base called Diego Garcia.
Mauritius claims by detaching the islands, Britain breached important provisions of the decolonization process. UN Resolution 1519 made express mention of the fact that the breakup of colonies prior to independence was banned. The purpose of this was to keep borders stable and to prevent colonial powers from simply absorbing colonial territory into their overseas territory so as to retain their sovereignty.
Right now, Diego Garcia is an important and strategic military base for the United States. Britain leased it to the United States, and now, Diego Garcia hosts a major US military base and is a strategic node in US bombing campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq. Which means that in the West’s insatiable quest to exert a dominant foreign policy on other nations, Diego Garcia is a very important point. It symbolizes control. Britain, being unwavering allies with the US, will never cede it to Mauritius.
It’s all about being reluctant to see an African country claim self-determination and sovereignty. The Islanders have been barred from returning to the Chagos Islands, and have been pursuing this matter with the ICJ, getting some success in the progress. In 2016, after several judicial challenges, Britain extended Diego Garcia’s lease until 2036 and declared that the expelled islanders would not be allowed to go back. In 2017, Mauritius successfully petitioned the United Nations to seek an ICJ advisory opinion on the legality of the separation.
Britain’s solicitor general Robert Buckland told Reuters his country accepted the removal of the Chagossians and their treatment thereafter “was shameful and wrong,” but that a 1982 payment of £4 million ($5.2 million) and land worth £1 million worth to Mauritius had provided resolution.
An ICJ verdict or advisory opinion is not legally binding, although it carries some significant weight. The fact that at Britain’s side are the US and Australia, chances of adhering to what the ICJ says are slim. On the other hand, Mauritius is backed by Argentina, Belize, Botswana, Brazil, Cyprus, Germany, Guatemala, India, Kenya, Marshall Islands, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Serbia, South Africa, Thailand, Vanuatu, and Zambia.
The long-lasting negative legacy of colonialism is Western powers still trying to have control over their former colonies. This is simply explained by economic and power-amassing interests. Dominance, control.
Professor Philippe Sands QC, representing Mauritius, told the ICJ, “The right to self-determination is not a ‘heritage’ issue. This is not Africa in the late 19th or early 20th century. This is September 2018.”