in

Trump Administration Suggests Replacing Food Stamps With Food Boxes

Older individuals among us may remember the days of “government cheese.” Now, in a move that is being condemned by many as callous and full of logical holes, the Trump Administration is planning on bringing this back, so to speak. Politico reports that the Administration recently proposed replacing food stamps with a box of government-picked, nonperishable foods every month. The main reasoning is saving billions in the years to come.

White House OMB Director Mick Mulvaney on Monday hailed the idea as one that kept up with the modern era, calling it a “Blue Apron-type program.” The idea was to not only save money for the government but provide more nutritious food, in theory. The proposal was hidden in the 2019 White House fiscal budget. It would replace about half the money that families get from food stamps and replace it with what the Department of Agriculture is calling “America’s Harvest Box.” That package would be made up of “100 percent U.S. grown and produced food” and would include items like shelf-stable milk, peanut butter, canned fruits and meats, and cereal.

There are issues with this and Mulvaney’s comparison. Fresh items like produce or meat won’t be included in the boxes, as they perish quickly and would raise shipping costs. Asked about how the delivery would work, USDA spokesman Tim Murtaugh clarified that states would “have flexibility” in how they choose to distribute the food to SNAP recipients.

Kevin Concannon, who oversaw SNAP during the Obama administration, was stunned at the news. “Holy mackerel,” said Concannon, who said it reminded him of when poor people had to line up and wait for local officials to dole out food and other welfare benefits. “I don’t know where this came from, but I suspect that the folks when they were drawing it up were also watching silent movies.” The Food Research and Action Center, a prominent nonprofit group, called the harvest box idea “a Rube-Goldberg designed system” that would be “costly, inefficient, stigmatizing, and prone to failure.”

There are also economic concerns, as many grocery stores use food stamps as a crucial portion of their profits. “This action would not only destabilize attempts to bring more healthy, fresh foods into the homes of America’s food insecure, but would keep dollars out of local grocery stores and farmers markets, which are critical assets to all communities,” said Jordan Rasmussen, a policy associate at the Center for Rural Affairs, a progressive rural advocacy group.

Loading...

What do you think?

600 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Gambia Begins Making Moves To Abolish Death Penalty In the Country

5 Benefits Of Shea Butter You Probably Don’t Know About