in , ,

‘Only Slave Descendants Should Be Granted Birthright Citizenship’ – Argues GOP Rep. Mark Sanford

A South Carolina congressman on Wednesday suggested that some babies born in the U.S. from other countries don’t deserve birthright status, falsely claiming the 14th Amendment was only intended for the descendants of formerly enslaved Blacks.

Appearing on MSNBC, outgoing Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) addressed President Donald Trump‘s plans to nix the constitutional amendment guaranteeing all “persons” born in the United States the right to citizenship — a power solely reserved to Congress. When asked his thoughts on the matter, Sanford said the issue was “much too complex” to revoke with the simple stroke of a pen.

Rep. Mark Sanford tried arguing the 14th Amendment was only intended to apply to former slaves. (MSNBC / video screenshot)

“I’m not a fan of birthright citizenship,” he told host Craig Melvin.

“Why are you not a fan of it?” Melvin inquired. “You do recognize that it’s in enshrined in the Constitution, the Fourteenth Amendment?”

The South Carolina Republican noted his co-sponsorship of a bill “that says otherwise” and  claimed, “there are a number of folks who’ve said that particular interpretation is not really what the founding fathers intended.”

“The idea that you just happen to come in from Haiti or anywhere else and because you get your boat to shore, all the sudden you are open to the same rights and privileges that anybody else is, I think that’s at odds with the intent,” said Sanford. “I think it was ultimately about slavery at that time and rights that should come to former slaves.”

Loading...

The Constitution makes no mention of slavery being a requirement, however. In fact, Article 1 of the 14th Amendment plainly states that, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

It continues, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Sanford, who lost his congressional seat in this year’s Republican primaries, said he’d leave the issue up to “the legal experts.”

According to the U.S. Constitution, children born in the U.S. and its territories to non-citizens or immigrants parents have the right to become citizens. The amendment was made 150 years ago to state that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

This is Trump’s new anti-immigrant move, which joins a list of many others including ending the DACA program, instituting a travel ban, blocking ‘non-professional’ immigrants from entering the U.S. and restricting legal immigration.

The president did not say when he would sign the order, but many are questioning the timing of the announcement, comes just days before the midterm elections slotted for November 6. But one thing for sure for him is: “It’s in the process. It’ll happen with an executive order.”

Loading...

Written by MT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South African Filmmakers in America on Investment Mission

Lenali App: How Mali’s Own Version of Facebook is Changing the Face of Social Media