A simple experiment was recently carried out by This Is Africa. We did an image search for “African children” on Google. The results were eye-opening especially when compared to Google searches for “American children” and “European children.” While the other two searches yielded images of cheerful, happy children, the image search for “African children” turned up many disturbing images of starving, distressed and yes, even gun-toting minors. Is this the real Africa or does Google need to play an active role in changing how the world sees the continent?
Death, disease, disaster and despair. For a long time, these are words that have defined how the rest of the world sees Africa. How much has that changed? Going by the evidence of a recent experiment conducted by This Is Africa, not much.
Africa’s “sad” children
When know you noticed it too. Google spits out more unflattering results for “African children” than it does for the other searches. Going by the image results, Africa’s children are sad-faced, poverty-stricken and so undernourished, they are at death’s door. But that’s not all, if you’re not happy with your results Google has some suggestions for alternative searches for all three. See if you notice anything “off” in the options provided.
Going by the image results, Africa’s children are sad-faced, poverty-stricken and so undernourished, they are at death’s door
Is this Google’s fault?
Who is to blame for the stark differences in the search results and the negative options provided as alternatives? It’s an attractive foil for our anger but we would be wrong to direct our fury at Google. A recent controversy in the US is helpful in understanding why this is so. Recently, a black teenager in the US noticed that he got more unflattering results when he searched “three black teenagers” on Google images as compared to “three white teenagers”.
Many called out the search giant for being “prejudiced”. Here’s how Google responded to the online pile on:
‘Our image search results are a reflection of content from across the web, including the frequency with which types of images appear and the way they’re described online. This means that sometimes unpleasant portrayals of sensitive subject matter online can affect what image search results appear for a given query. ‘These results don’t reflect Google’s own opinions or beliefs – as a company, we strongly value a diversity of perspectives, ideas and cultures.”The blame is on “us”
It’s hard not to agree with Google here. Google search results are more a reflection of our society than any wrong doing on the part of the company. Search engines like Google don’t think for themselves, they respond to what we feed them. When Google images spits out unflattering images of African children it’s merely reflecting the conscious and subconscious prejudices of those who use it.
So just to be clear, this is not on Google, it’s on us.
Source: This is Africa