, ,

CCTV Video Footage? Grace Mugabe vs Gabriella “Violent Attack” On Both Women By Either Of Them.

The most recent in the Gabriella Engels versus Grace Mugabe case has seen calls for CCTV footage being raised.

These calls became electric with the disclosures of Grace Mugabe’s statement published by the Reuters news organization yesterday in which accursing allegations were leveled on Chatunga Mugabe’s female colleague, Gabriella Engels; that she acted viciously against Zimbabwe’s First Lady when requested to leave Chatungas’ Johannesburg elegant lodging room on the13th August 2017.

 

Grace in her court papers says she was about to be attacked with a knife.

It has been Gabriella’s argument that she was assaulted for no reason and that this could be proved through CCTV footage inside the hotel. But the footage needed to make the case credible would be hotel room inside video, which is impossible as due to privacy issues, would be situated outside in corridors and other parts of the premises.

The opinion pointers on Gabriella being a drug peddler have been made vivid by her own submissions that she was neither a girlfriend nor a friend of Chatunga’s. Analysts have raised questions on what could then have earned her access to Chatunga’s hotel room since she was no friend, because the only other reason would be her getting close to Chatunga through being a supplier of intoxicating substances.

These pointers have some weight added through Gabriella’s own admissions that there was another incident of violent fighting at Taboo night club before the Grace Mugabe incident occurred. For this incident once again, CCTV footage has been called upon in order to verify the truth on the assertions made.

The absence of convincing evidence has meant Gabriella’s case could forever remain one sided against Zimbabwe’s First Lady while at the same time, appearing to be in effect strongly against Gabriella herself, the latter portrayed as a violent drug addict who was negatively influencing Grace’s son Chatunga.

The Reuters article states in part: in a previously unreported Aug. 17 deposition seen by Reuters, Mugabe countered 20-year-old Engels’ version, portraying herself as the victim after intervening on behalf of her adult sons Chatunga and Robert Junior who were “in trouble with a drunken young woman”.

The statement said Grace Mugabe, 52 and a contender to replace her 93-year-old husband as Zimbabwe’s president, was thinking about filing attempted murder charges.

According to Engels, an irate Mugabe burst into the room where she was waiting with two friends to meet Chatunga Mugabe on Aug. 13 and started laying into her with an electric cable.

Photographs taken by her mother soon after the incident showed a gash to Engels’ forehead and head. She also had bruising on her thighs.

In her deposition, Mugabe dismissed Engels’ version as “malicious allegations” and said she had been attacked after going to help her sons.

“She was worried about them and went to see them at their hotel suite,” the statement said. “Upon her arrival, Ms Engels, who was intoxicated and unhinged, attacked Dr. Grace Mugabe with a knife after she was asked to leave the hotel.”

“Security was left with no other option but to remove Ms Engels from the hotel suite,” it continued.

The statement also alleged that Engels had been in a fight with other women at Johannesburg’s Taboo nightclub the previous evening and suggested that may have been the cause of her injuries.

Afriforum, an Afrikaans civil society group acting on behalf of Engels, denied both accusations.

“Gabriella never attacked Grace Mugabe in any way and she did not participate in the fight at Taboo,” Afriforum said.

“It is clear that Grace Mugabe is desperately trying to escape responsibility for her own violent behaviour by using lies to falsely portray the victim in this case as the perpetrator.”

South Africa granted Grace Mugabe diplomatic immunity, allowing her to evade immediate prosecution for assault, although Engels and Afriforum have challenged that decision, saying Mugabe was not in South Africa on official business.

They also argued that assault was a “grave crime” that was not covered by diplomatic immunity laws.

The decision to let Grace Mugabe return home caused a row in South Africa, with the opposition Democratic Alliance also going to court to overturn the immunity. (Reporting by Ed Cropley; Editing by Mark Trevelyan).

Loading...

What do you think?

600 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *